What Are Security Controls (and How to Start Adopting Them)
A plain explanation of what a security control is, the main types, and how to start adopting them from a curated library instead of writing policies from scratch.
7 min read
If you have started looking into SOC 2 or a security review, you have run into the word control everywhere, usually without a definition. It sounds like jargon for something complicated. It is not. A control is simply a named thing you do to keep data safe, written down so you can prove you actually do it.
This is the middle step of building a compliance program. If you want the full path from your first security review to an audit, start with How to Start a Security Compliance Program. This piece zooms in on controls: what they are, the main kinds, and how to start adopting them without turning it into a research project.
What a Control Actually Is
A control is a commitment plus the proof that you keep it. Three parts:
- The commitment. A specific practice, stated plainly. "We review who has access to production every quarter." "We encrypt customer data at rest." "We run a background check before a new hire starts."
- An owner. One person accountable for the control being true, not a committee.
- Evidence. Something that shows the practice really happened: an access review export, a signed policy, a completed checklist. Good evidence has a freshness date, because "we did this once in 2024" is not the same as "we did this last quarter."
Put a few dozen of these together and you have a security program. An auditor's job is to check that your controls are real and your evidence is current. A framework like SOC 2 is just a specific list of controls a standard expects to see.
The Main Types of Controls
You do not need to memorize a taxonomy, but it helps to know the shape of a complete program. Controls tend to fall into a handful of areas:
- Access and identity: who can reach what, and how you review it.
- Data protection: encryption, retention, and how data is handled and disposed of.
- Governance and people: policies, security training, and background checks.
- Change and vulnerability management: how code ships and how you find and fix weaknesses.
- Resilience and incidents: backups, continuity, and how you respond when something goes wrong.
- Vendors and privacy: the third parties that touch your data, and your obligations under regulations like GDPR and CCPA/CPRA.
A framework spreads its requirements across these areas. When your controls cover them, the framework is largely covered too.
How to Start Adopting Them
The instinct is to open a blank document and start writing policies. Do not. Two reasons: you will miss things a standard expects, and you will spend weeks on wording before you have proven a single practice.
Start from a curated library instead. Adopt the controls that match how you already operate, and skip or note the ones that do not apply. For each control you adopt:
- Assign an owner who can actually keep it true.
- Attach evidence that the practice is happening, and set how fresh that evidence needs to stay.
- Record an exception where a control genuinely does not apply, with a short reason, so the gap is documented rather than hidden.
Today, adopting a control and attaching its evidence is a hands-on step: an owner uploads or attests to the proof. That is a feature, not a limitation. The person accountable for a practice is the person who should confirm it is real, and it means your program reflects what you actually do rather than what a scan guessed.
In Concord, this is the Controls area of Concord Trust: adopt from the library, assign owners, attach evidence, and watch each control's status. When you are ready to prove it against a standard, adopt a framework and your controls map straight onto its requirements.
Where Controls Fit
Controls are the part of a compliance program you can start today, before you commit to a framework or book an audit. They turn "we take security seriously" into something specific and provable, and they are the evidence behind every good answer you give in a security review. Get the practices written down and owned, and the framework and the audit become a mapping exercise rather than a scramble.